Quality Management

Can AI Agents replace traditional Robotic Process Automation (RPA) for complex workflows?

AL Asked by Alan Grant · 15-03-2025
0 upvotes 14,406 views 0 comments
The question

We have a lot of legacy RPA bots (UiPath) that handle invoice data entry, but they break every time the vendor changes their PDF layout. I’ve heard that "Agentic RPA" is the next big thing. Can AI Agents actually handle the "clicking and typing" on old legacy software, or are they only good for cloud-based API tasks? We are looking for a solution that combines the reliability of RPA with the visual "intelligence" of an LLM to handle non-structured data.

3 answers

0
SA
Answered on 17-03-2025

Traditional RPA is "brittle" because it relies on fixed selectors—if a button moves 5 pixels, the bot fails. "Agentic RPA" uses Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to "see" the screen like a human. Instead of looking for a specific HTML tag, the agent looks for the concept of a "Submit Button." This makes it much more resilient to UI changes. In 2024, tools like Microsoft’s Copilot Studio and UiPath’s own "Autopilot" are merging these worlds. You still use RPA for the high-speed "boring" tasks, but you use the Agent for the "judgment calls" like reading a handwritten note on an invoice.

0
GR
Answered on 18-03-2025

Is the latency an issue here? Sending a screenshot to a model like GPT-4o every time you want to move the mouse sounds like it would take a long time compared to a local RPA script.

WI 20-03-2025

You're right, Gregory, it's definitely slower. You shouldn't use an agent to "click" every single field. The best architecture is "Hybrid": use the agent to extract the data from the messy PDF into a clean JSON format once, and then let the traditional RPA bot "blast" that data into your ERP system at high speed. Use the AI for the intelligence and the RPA for the execution. This saves on API costs and prevents the agent from getting confused by every single pop-up window on a legacy desktop app.

0
LI
Answered on 21-03-2025

We switched to a "Vision-first" agent for our SAP entry, and our maintenance tickets dropped by 60%. It’s slower per transaction, but it doesn't break every Monday morning.

AL 22-03-2025

That 60% reduction in maintenance is the real ROI. The "hidden cost" of RPA has always been the developers' time spent fixing broken selectors. Agents solve that.

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)

Professional Counselling Session

Still have questions?
Schedule a free counselling session

Our experts are ready to help you with any questions about courses, admissions, or career paths. Get personalized guidance from industry professionals.

Request a Call Back

Search Online

We Accept

We Accept

Follow Us

"PMI®", "PMBOK®", "PMP®", "CAPM®" and "PMI-ACP®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. | "CSM", "CST" are Registered Trade Marks of The Scrum Alliance, USA. | COBIT® is a trademark of ISACA® registered in the United States and other countries.

Book Free Session