I have the option to get certified through my current employer or an external body like ASQ or IASSC. Which one looks better on a resume to external recruiters? I want a certification that is globally recognized if I decide to change industries in the next two years.
3 answers
ASQ is generally considered the "gold standard" because of its rigorous requirements and mandatory project verification. If you have an ASQ Green Belt, you are set for any industry. IASSC is also highly respected but is exam-focused and doesn't require a project for the initial certification. Company-specific certifications (like from GE or Toyota) are prestigious but can sometimes be harder for external HR departments to verify if they don't know the company's specific standards. In 2024, I recommend going for an external body if you plan on jumping industries, as it provides a "third-party" validation of your skills that isn't tied to one specific internal process.
If I already have a company-specific Green Belt, is it worth the money to go back and pay for an IASSC or ASQ exam just to have that name on my resume?
Consistency is key. If your company uses a specific flavor of Six Sigma, stick with that until you've mastered it. Results speak louder than the certifying logo.
I agree with Patricia. I've hired many Green Belts, and I always look at the results in their "Experience" section before checking the "Certifications" section.
Ryan, only do it if you find that recruiters aren't recognizing your current cert. Usually, if you have a section on your resume detailing a high-impact project you led at your company, that carries more weight than the name on the certificate. However, if your company is small or not known for operational excellence, then an ASQ or IASSC "refresh" can act as a safety net. It’s more about the "Body of Knowledge" you can demonstrate during the technical interview than the logo itself.