Cyber Security

Is AutoGen robust enough for automated threat hunting in Cyber Security?

BR Asked by Brian Simmons · 12-01-2025
0 upvotes 6,732 views 0 comments
The question

I'm curious if Is AutoGen the future of enterprise AI agents? in the context of a Security Operations Center (SOC). Can we have agents that constantly monitor logs and "talk" to each other to correlate events? I’m worried about "false positive" loops where agents keep escalating non-issues because they are over-analyzing the chat history. Has anyone stress-tested this framework for real-time security monitoring?

3 answers

0
PA
Answered on 15-01-2025

Using AutoGen for Cyber Security requires a very different prompting strategy. In early 2024, we built a prototype for automated incident response. We had a "Monitor" agent, a "Forensics" agent, and a "Manager" agent. To prevent the "false positive" loop you mentioned, we implemented a "Grounding Tool." Before the Forensics agent could escalate, it had to query a real-time threat feed API to see if the IP or hash was truly malicious. This prevented the agents from just "hallucinating" a threat based on a weird-looking log entry. It's powerful, but it needs real-world data anchors to stay reliable.

0
KE
Answered on 18-01-2025

Pamela, how did you handle the latency? In a SOC, seconds matter. Doesn't the back-and-forth between agents take too long to respond to an active breach?

JE 21-01-2025

Kenneth, for "active" breaches, you still need traditional automated rules (SOAR). Where AutoGen shines is in "Post-Incident Analysis" or "Hunting." It can spend 10 minutes digging through 10,000 logs to find the "low and slow" lateral movement that a traditional rule might miss. It’s an analyst's assistant, not a replacement for a firewall. We treat the crew as a Tier 2 analyst that works 24/7. It doesn't need to respond in milliseconds; it just needs to find the needles in the haystack that the humans are too tired to look for.

0
DI
Answered on 23-01-2025

We found that using a local model for the initial filtering and then escalating the "interesting" logs to an AutoGen crew with GPT-4 saved us a ton of money.

BR 25-01-2025

Diane's hybrid approach is the only way to make this cost-effective. You can't feed every single log to a multi-agent chat. You have to be strategic about what gets "discussed" by the crew.

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)

Professional Counselling Session

Still have questions?
Schedule a free counselling session

Our experts are ready to help you with any questions about courses, admissions, or career paths. Get personalized guidance from industry professionals.

Request a Call Back

Search Online

We Accept

We Accept

Follow Us

"PMI®", "PMBOK®", "PMP®", "CAPM®" and "PMI-ACP®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. | "CSM", "CST" are Registered Trade Marks of The Scrum Alliance, USA. | COBIT® is a trademark of ISACA® registered in the United States and other countries.

World globe icon Country: India

Book Free Session