Software Development

What is the best strategy for handling large PDF files in a Haystack search engine?

ST Asked by Steven Garrett · 03-11-2025
0 upvotes 13,231 views 0 comments
The question

Our search engine needs to index thousands of 50-page PDF reports. When we index them as single documents, the retrieval is poor because the chunks are too large for the LLM context. What are the best practices in Haystack for "Chunking" and "Preprocessing" long PDFs to ensure the search engine finds the exact paragraph needed?

3 answers

0
JA
Answered on 15-05-2025

For long PDFs, the PreProcessor component in Haystack is your best friend. You should use the split_by="word" or split_by="sentence" options with a split_overlap of about 10-15%. This ensures that no context is lost at the boundaries of the chunks. In a project I did in late 2023, we found that a split_length of 250 words worked best for our technical manuals. This size is small enough to provide very specific context to the LLM but large enough to retain a coherent meaning. Also, make sure to enable clean_whitespace to remove all those messy PDF artifacts.

0
GR
Answered on 01-06-2025

When you split a 50-page PDF into smaller chunks, how do you handle the loss of global context? For example, if a chunk on page 40 refers to "The Project" mentioned on page 1, the retriever might find the chunk but the LLM won't know what project it's about.

AR 20-06-2025

Gregory, that's where "Metadata Injection" comes in. When you run the PreProcessor, you can tell Haystack to attach the document's title or summary to every single chunk. This way, even if a chunk is deep in the report, the LLM still sees the context that it belongs to "Project X." It’s a very common SEO and RAG strategy to ensure the "local" chunk carries "global" meaning. Haystack makes this automated during the indexing pipeline phase.

0
SH
Answered on 15-07-2025

Using the PyPDFToDocument converter with a well-configured PreProcessor handles 90% of PDF issues. It’s all about finding that "Goldilocks" chunk size for your specific data.

ST 05-08-2025

Definitely. I’ve found that experimenting with different split lengths can lead to a 20% increase in retrieval accuracy. It’s worth the extra testing time.

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)

Professional Counselling Session

Still have questions?
Schedule a free counselling session

Our experts are ready to help you with any questions about courses, admissions, or career paths. Get personalized guidance from industry professionals.

Request a Call Back

Search Online

We Accept

We Accept

Follow Us

"PMI®", "PMBOK®", "PMP®", "CAPM®" and "PMI-ACP®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. | "CSM", "CST" are Registered Trade Marks of The Scrum Alliance, USA. | COBIT® is a trademark of ISACA® registered in the United States and other countries.

Book Free Session