My insurance broker is pushing a cyber liability policy, but the premiums have doubled since last year. They want us to have an incident response plan and EDR before they even cover us. If we are already spending money on those security tools, is the insurance actually providing any extra value, or is it just another "tax" on small businesses trying to stay digital?
3 answers
I used to think it was a "tax" until we had a Business Email Compromise (BEC) incident in late 2023. The insurance didn't just pay for the lost funds; they provided a forensic team and legal counsel to handle the data notification laws we didn't even know existed. Without them, we would have spent months in court. The high premiums and "security requirements" are the industry's way of forcing businesses to improve. Think of it like a fire code—the insurer won't cover a building that doesn't have sprinklers. It’s an essential safety net for the costs you can't predict, like legal fees and reputation repair.
Heather, did you find the "forensic team" helpful, or did they just slow down your recovery? I've heard some stories where the insurance company's investigators took weeks to clear a system for restart.
Most policies now require MFA. If you don't have it enabled and get hacked, they might deny your claim entirely. Read the fine print!
Cynthia is right. Compliance isn't optional anymore; it's a condition of the contract. You have to walk the walk to get the coverage.
Marcus, it’s a trade-off. They took about 4 days to clear our core servers, which felt like an eternity, but they found a "backdoor" the hackers had left behind that our local IT guy completely missed. If we had restarted without their forensic audit, we would have been re-encrypted within 48 hours. The delay saved us from a second, much larger ransom. In my opinion, the expertise they bring during a crisis is actually more valuable than the cash payout itself.