How Can Project Managers Manage Technical Debt for Quality Deliverables?

Modern project management in 2025 goes beyond tool adoption, requiring leaders to balance essential tech skills with proactive management of technical debt to safeguard quality outcomes.An industry report released this month found that about $5.1 trillion of potential business value sits idle worldwide in technical debt. That holds back product development and robs important projects of resources. That colossal amount spells out that tech debt is not just a technical problem; it's a large project management and business issue that demands scrutiny by top leaders and bespoke solutions to fix. For experienced project managers, comprehension and management of this hidden risk is paramount to success today.

In this article, you will learn:

• The key difference between deliberate and accidental technical debt.
• Why technical debt is a contemporary competence of the project manager.
• Different methods of measurement and understanding the risk of technical debt.
• How to balance fixing technical debt with delivering new functionality.
• The function of dedicated project management software in monitoring and prioritizing debt.
• How quality management best practices can help to avoid new technical debt.

Introduction: Code to Capital Risk

Technical debt, by Ward Cunningham's definition, is the extra cost that is incurred by shortcuts or bad design choices while building a product. Like money debt, short-term it can speed things up but causes problems later on, including increased complexity, slower future development, and weaker systems. For a seasoned project manager with over a decade of experience, this is not only the dev team's problem; this jeopardizes project success, upsets stakeholders, and can affect overall quality management.

Ignoring technical debt signals a fundamental misunderstanding of the long-term value of maintainability. The core question is: How can the experienced project manager transform this risk from an unavoidable burden into a manageable, strategic backlog item? The answer lies in specialized governance, precise measurement, and integrating debt reduction into the continuous development cycle.

Understanding Tech Debt: Planned vs. Unplanned

In order to tackle a problem, its actual nature should first be determined. The technical debt is not one-dimensional. It is mostly of two types, and each calls for a different project management.

Organized Technical Debt (Strategic Debt)

This occurs when the team takes a short cut to fulfill an impending deadline or get an early jump on the market. This is a thoughtful decision. A minimum viable product (MVP), for example, typically includes scheduled debt. The danger is that they will not have time subsequently to "pay the interest," that is, refactor the temporary code into a solid solution. A good project manager recognizes this decision as a project risk and documents an explicit task for repairing later.

Unintended Technical Debt (Accidental Debt)

This is the more pernicious form, resulting from poor design, lack of clear architectural standards, inadequate testing, or simple skill deficits within the team. This debt is incurred unintentionally and is often discovered only when systems begin to fail or development velocity grinds to a halt. This type of debt is a direct reflection of suboptimal project management processes and insufficient quality management practices. Identifying and correcting the process that generates this debt is as important as fixing the debt itself.

The Project Manager's Role: Governance and Oversight

The veteran project manager is the crucial bridge between the technical staff who design and grapple with the debt, and the business people who foot the bill.

The Transitions to Strategic Risk Management:

The project manager should make technical debt explicit, express technical debt in business terms (e.g., lost dev time or bug increase), and bring it up during the high-level planning meetings.

This involves moving the discussion beyond lines of code to focus on system stability, future scalability, and development team morale—all key project performance indicators.

The manager will require to negotiate resources to allocate to debt payoff, seeing this as a smart investment and not a cost. That will normally equate to asking for "architectural runway" time during each sprint or each release iteration.

Evaluating and Measuring Technical Debt Risk

In order to tackle technical debt as a genuine project risk, you can't depend on an educated guess or myths. Good project management demands that.

The Cost-of-Delay Measurement

Good project management, rather than only considering how much it will cost to repair the debt, considers the cost of waiting. This questions: What will cost the company money or strategically, should we wait to repair this debt three months or a year? This shifts the conversation, putting the focus on lost opportunities by being technically unstable.

Utilizing Special Project Management Tools to Track

Contemporary project management tools keep track of more than just the project's tasks. One should integrate code analysis and results of static analysis into the project's backlog.

Metric-Driven Backlog Items: The debt items should be marked with metrics like complexity metrics, bug density, and estimated refactoring time.

Consult dashboards within project management software to observe how debt is accumulating. If the debt grows faster than payments being made against debt, then this indicates to the project manager that intervention and adjustments should be made.

Risk Register Incorporation: All noteworthy technical debt should go into the project risk register, with associated mitigation plan and accountable owner, and should be actively managed.

Strategic Choices: Merging Delivery and Remediation

The thorniest issue in significant projects is the debate over how to allocate time between developing new functionality and paying off technical debt. The experienced project manager regards this as a false dilemma.

The "Debt-to-Feature Ratio" Strategy

Good planning necessitates saving some amount of development time—typically 10% to 20%—for debt payoff. This practice, sometimes referred to as "Sustained Engineering" or "Architectural Runway," ensures that debt is paid off on a regular basis and not left to get too large. This budget should be immutable and upheld by the project manager. When following step-by-step approaches, the project manager should ensure that each sprint gets designated activities for paying off technical debt, and it should be a significant portion of the work.

The "Paved Road" Method

This plan is preventative of future debt. The project manager supports the idea of having common, quality, pre-approved parts, libraries, and deployment pipelines—what we refer to as the "paved road." By using these standards within our teams, the chance of accidently creating debt diminishes immensely, and quality management is boosted. It takes some time up front, but the payoff to quality and speed down the line is vast.

Quality Management: The Best Debt Prevention Strategy

The best way to handle technical debt is to avoid its buildup in the first place. That's where quality management and careful process come into play. The debt always builds up by cutting too many corners during testing and not having a clear definition of what "done" is.

The Function of Automated Testing

The project manager should foster an environment that considers test automation necessary and not an afterthought. Most automated tests (unit, integration, and end-to-end) afford a useful safety net, whereby developers can make code changes and fix issues with the knowledge that they won't induce new problems. Investments made in test systems yield returns to project stability and future velocity, and that's very valuable to good project management.

Applying Definition of Done (DoD)

The effective DoD should have rules that explicitly prevent new deliberate debt being incurred without executive approval and a plan to rectify it. Moreover, the DoD should insist on code review rules, documentation updating, and success through all automated tests. The project manager adheres to this standard rigidly to ensure that quality is upheld.

The Project Manager as Cultural Champion

Finally, repaying technical debt is really about changing the culture. The project manager's ideal candidate should be the individual to make the team move their thinking from short-term results to long-term growth. The following are included:

Rewarding Quality: Reward developers by recognizing and rewarding pieces of refactoring and code quality improvement rather than only praising new feature rollout.

Knowledge Transfer: Allocating time to code review and knowledge transfer across teams to help keep code quality consistent and recognize problems sooner.

Commercial Education: Continually educating all parties about the value of debt reduction over the long term, with precise cost-of-delay metrics found in contemporary project management software.

The key to better quality of work is based on proper plans and careful management of decision-making. Today's project managers must take the lead and make use of their expert knowledge to prevent quick gains from compromising future stability and growth.

Conclusion

The ability to manage technical debt for quality deliverables is becoming just as critical for project managers as specialized skills are for landing the world’s highest-paying jobs.Technical debt occurs while undertaking large, complex systems within short timescales. However, if this is too large an issue, that's a project management and planning failure. A good project manager can alter this dynamic. By making the debt more comprehensible, by putting metrics on its cost to the business, by allocating time to rectify it, and by keeping quality management best practices front and center, teams can ensure that quality work is the norm rather than the exception. Modern project management software and an organizational culture prioritizing long-term success keep progress consistent and insulate the organization against the unrecognized perils of legacy technology.

In today’s dynamic business world, the power of PMP certification is amplified by upskilling, enabling professionals to embrace innovation and drive sustainable success.For any upskilling or training programs designed to help you either grow or transition your career, it's crucial to seek certifications from platforms that offer credible certificates, provide expert-led training, and have flexible learning patterns tailored to your needs. You could explore job market demanding programs with iCertGlobal; here are a few programs that might interest you:

1. PMP Training
2. CAPM
3. PgMP
4. PMI-RMP

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the single most effective way for a project manager to prevent the creation of new technical debt?
   The most effective strategy is the rigorous enforcement of a comprehensive and strict Definition of Done (DoD). This DoD must explicitly require adherence to code standards, full test coverage, and updated documentation before any work is considered complete, making high quality management an essential gatekeeper.
   
2. How often should a project manager schedule time for technical debt remediation?
   It should be a continuous activity, not a sporadic one. Experienced project managers typically mandate allocating a fixed percentage (e.g., 10-20%) of development capacity in every iteration or sprint solely for technical debt reduction, ensuring it is paid down incrementally and sustainably.
   
3. Are specialized project management tools required to track technical debt?
   While general project management tools can track the tasks, specialized tools (often code analysis or static analysis software) are necessary to quantify the debt and integrate those metrics directly into the project backlog. This provides the project manager with objective data required for strategic prioritization and stakeholder negotiation.
   
4. How does technical debt relate to quality management in project delivery?
   Technical debt is an antithesis to quality management. It represents a compromise in quality (e.g., maintainability, stability, and testability) for short-term gains. Effective quality management seeks to minimize this debt by establishing high standards for code, architecture, and testing from the outset.